How FMN And FRE Can Help Solve The Unemployment An Foreclosure Crisis

February 10, 2010 by Leonard C. Tekaat

Do You Want Lower Taxes And Smaller Deficit?

Providing the Economy with what it needs to Reduce Unemployment And Foreclosures 

What Is Missing From President Obama’s Plan?  Why Are Housing, Consumers, Jobs and Small Business Having A Slow Recovery?  Why Is the Mortgage Interest Rate At Historical High! Tax credits increase government deficit.  The Dollar Will Increase In Value As Our Trade And National Deficit Decreases. 

Normal capital markets did not cure the Great Depression of the 1930s and they cannot solve this economic crisis either, because collateral values have decreased so much and so many homes have underwater mortgages.  

Economic recovery cannot be provided by the capitalist entity because it is still healing and will experience a relapse if interest rates continue to rise.  

It is not difficult for banks to make loans when collateral prices are going up.  When collateral prices are going down banks are in “preservation mode” and are very concerned about capital balances. They only make very well secured loans. 

The government’s job programs of the 1930s helped decrease the misery but they did not end the Great Depression. Many economists agree that World War II did 

For an economic stimulus to work it must increase the purchasing power of the people not the banks. People create economic demand not banks. 

The main objectives of any economic recovery plan should be to strengthen the financial service industry, keep homeowners in their homes and make the home mortgage payments affordable as the homeowner pays off their mortgage. Stabilize collateral prices, increase lending to small businesses, increase aggregate demand and reenergize the private enterprise job-creating portion of the economy.  Reduce excessive credit use and speculation when appropriate.  Dampen “economic jubilance” before bubbles are created. Maintain the value of money and capital without raising cost. Mortgage originators must be licensed. Improve their training requirements with economic and financial counseling classes.  The secondary securitization industry must require higher standards and transparency for their products, if they want investors to invest in their financial products. 

Real interest cost is based on the spread between the inflation rate and the interest rate.  If the mortgage interest rate is 6% and the inflation rate is 3% the real cost of the mortgage is 3% or express another way, 100% above the inflation rate.  The inflation /deflation rate in housing is minus 0% yet the mortgage interest rate is aprox. 5% the real cost of the mortgage is 5% or expressed in another way it is 500% or more above the inflation/deflation rate.  Instead of the real interest rate being lowered to stimulate economy the government is trying to stimulate the economy by deficit spending which will increase the inflation rate, which will bring down the real cost of interest, which will stimulate the economy.  The problem is that you now have a huge deficit to contend with, which will mean taxes will have to be increased or the economy pays an inflation tax and we are all pushed up into higher tax brackets.  People on the lower end of the income scale can’t increase their incomes to keep up with inflation, so they become more government dependent. Deficit spending increases the size of government and taxpayer’s liabilities. 

Unlike the Home Owners Loan Corporation, which Congress created in the Great Depression to deal with foreclosure and underwater mortgages, this economic recovery plan does not call for the government to purchase the caustic mortgages from the banks. 

I want to discuss with you, a different approach to economic recovery.  

Enclosed you will find an alternative plan to the government’s foreclosure and economic recovery program. I believe that if you improve the purchasing power of a large portion of the population this will help the minority of the population by improving the entire economy. Helping the 10% unemployed is a noble effort but does not create sufficient aggregate demand to re-employ the unemployed or the under employed. The second part of the plan addresses part of problems that caused the bubble economy we have had in the last decade and the reoccurring cycles of recession and inflation since the 1960s  

To solve the unemployment and foreclosure crisis and stabilize mortgage interest rates, we must start by doing two things.  

First, we need to create a mortgage with terms that fit the current economic conditions.  

The new mortgage I am proposing would improve the economy and the financial condition of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac (FNM & FRE) and the banks. I call it the 30 yr. 2010 STABILITY MORTGAGE. It would have a starting interest rate of 3% and increase 1/4% a year. (3% is currently more than 300% above the inflation/deflation rate of 0%.  Mortgage rates have been historically 100% above the inflation rate. (3% inflation, 6% interest rate) The current mortgage interest rate is over 500% above the inflation rate-0% inflation, 5% interest rate). The interest rate on the new mortgage would cap out at 5%. The borrower would have to qualify at the 5% interest rate. Mortgages that are underwater would have their unpaid balance reduced by an amount equal to 20 to 30% of their monthly payment amount each month for 10yrs or until the mortgage equals the then current possible sale price of the home. (Reducing the mortgage monthly by a small amount would be less of a loss to the mortgage holder than by reducing the mortgage by foreclosure or a short sale.) The main objective is to keep the homeowner in their home and make the home mortgage payments affordable as the homeowner pays off the mortgage.  Stabilize collateral prices, increase lending to small businesses and reenergize the enterprise job-creating portion of the economy 

The banks are offering the 5/1 ARM, which has a lower interest rate, but hardly anyone uses it because it is indexed after 5yrs. People do not like indexed mortgages because of our recent history and the unknown future. The 3% starting interest rate is not a subsidized rate of interest. Mortgage interest rate should be lower based on the inflation/deflation rate of 0% and the cost of funds to the banks and financial sector.  

If FNM & FRE and the Federal Reserve (Fed) said they would buy a mortgage with a 3% starting rate, the banks would offer it to the public. Temporarily, if necessary the US Treasury would buy FNM & FRE bonds. (US Treasury would receive the money back when the Fed bought the Mortgage Backed Securities (MBSs) from FNM & FRE.  The banks would earn the fees for arranging and servicing the home mortgage. FNM & FRE would have less loses from foreclosures. They would be collecting interest on a larger mortgage than if they foreclosed or short sold the home. The MBSs the Fed currently holds would go up in value and should be sold to investors to reduce the Fed’s balance sheet. The Fed would buy the new MBSs and sell them to investors, after home prices stabilized and the mortgage interest rate, on the new mortgage, had risen above the 10yr T-Bill rate.  

This plan will not cost taxpayers a dime.  It will not put our children and great grand children into massive debt. Empower the people with opportunity and the means of exchange; you will see that it can be done without increasing the size of the deficit or government and government dependency.  

Enacting the ZERO INFLATION TAXATION POLICY is the second thing we should do. This policy will help prevent another economic crisis similar to the one that we are currently experiencing. It would also create a stabile market for thirty year fixed rate mortgages and other long-term debt. It will strengthen the US dollar.  We must earn money the old fashion way.  We must earn it, not just create it.  

Conclusion: Foreclosures should decrease if the mortgage reduction plan is put into effect and the mortgage starting interest rate is reduced to 3%. The homeowner’s purchasing power will increase by 50% of their monthly interest payment, if their current mortgage interest rate is 6% or more the first year and then slowly decrease the following seven years. With increased consumer purchasing power, aggregate demand would increase, there by employment would increase. The banks would become stronger because their customers would become financially stronger and the collateral for small business loans would be stabilized. 

If this economic recovery plan makes sense to you, call your friends, news, and TV station, Congress or the President and express your support. Unless the private enterprise entity speaks up, the capitalistic entity will continue to gamble in the capital markets, buy government debt and profit from the Fed’s discounted interest rate; Thereby denying the enterprise entity the means of exchange it needs to have a broad based economic recovery. If this economic recovery will make your life better, please send the e-mail or make the call now!  If they’re is anyone, a group, business association or political organization that wants to join me in changing the government’s policy of deficit spending, let me know.  E-mail economysflaw@yahoo.com 

If you would like to discuss the Zero Inflation Taxation Policy or any other matter, I am available. Go to my web site for more information. www.economysflaw.wordpress.com/ Read Alternative Economic Stimulus Plan.  

Leonard C. Tekaat is a retired economic analyst, economic scholar, businessman, financier, investor, author and former candidate for California Congress. He has over forty years in the financial world. 

Review of Policy 

From: “Economics Professor Mark Evans CSUB” To: “Leonard Tekaat” Hi, Leonard. I agree that current policies haven’t been very effective thus far in addressing the foreclosure mess and that the macro economy remains vulnerable to a two-dipper because of it. I think we probably need something along the lines you suggest that cuts both interest rates and the principle upon which the monthly payments are based. Several months ago, I found a couple columns online by Alan Blinder that described the highly successful program that was implemented during the depression due to upside-down mortgages and defaults. The agency that was created to run this program ran a profit and was “put to rest” sometime in the 1950’s when the last of the contracts expired. I’m not sure without looking at it more closely, but I think your suggestion may work in a similar fashion. We also need some regulatory changes to reduce the risk of bubbles and we needed the stimulus package, as imperfect as it was. Mark Evans.

This is my reply to Professor Evans.

On Thu, 1/28/10, Leonard Tekaat wrote:> From: Leonard Tekaat > Subject: Re: From Leonard Tekaat> To: “Mark Evans” > Date: Thursday, January 28, 2010, 6:16 AM> I> agree regulation on the mortgage origination sector and> banks is needed. On the Stimulus I am not so sure. The banks> are investing in that debt instead of in the economy. > > By enacting the Zero Inflation Taxation Policy this> would decrease the excessive creation of money after> inflation is occurring in an economy. At my web site> you will find an article on this policy and a comment> section. The Alternative Economic Stimulus Plan is> also worth reading. Some of the tax policies of the 1990s> helped create the economic crisis of 2008. It just took time> to snow ball into a bubble. I am referring to the> $500,000.00 homeowner’s capital gains exclusion. Please> read the article and you will understand what I am talking> about. Waiting for your reply.

Comment From: happyashell Fri Jan 29, 2010 12:20:05 PST You are all correct. Many economists agree that World War II did end the Great Depression. We do need more manufacturing in the US. We have missed guided our economy for so long that we have priced ourselves out of the world markets. Wages and cost are lower in other countries so companies move over seas. We give preferred trading status to other countries to help them develop their economies and then they slam the door in our face when we want to sell our goods in their country. The world is a better place with free trade but it must be equal free trade.

President Obama did say that he wanted to stop giving tax credits to companies that located in these developing economies. This would be a good thing. It makes no sense to give the other countries a bigger advantage over us than they already have, with their lower wages and cost. Our economy is a profit based market economy.

Business must make a profit to stay in business. This is why people’s purchasing power and confidence must be maintained so consumers can consume and business can be profitable. The more people that can be employed in the private enterprise entity the better our economy works. By correcting the flaw in our mortgage delivery system we can put people back to work. The private capital entity or the capital markets cannot do it this time, because the need for profit and the fear investors have that they will not receive all of their investment back. The government and the private sector can do it together and make a profit if they adopt the plan I have outlined.

I suggest that you all go to my web site and read Alternative Economic Stimulus Plan. It explains some of the reasons on how we created this economic crisis. The perfect storm was created, not all at once but piece by piece over a long period of time

Don’t forget to send that e-mail or make that phone call. It is going take all of us to get the message across to make this happen! You have the opportunity improve your children’s and grand children’s lives. Do it now!

If there is anyone or group out there that can help by adopting this program as their own and help raise the funds to get this message out, please contact me. economysflaw@yahoo.com/

Report a Violation

Comment From: happyashell

Sat Jan 30, 2010 04:25:14 PST

Posted by happyashell on Jan 29, 2010 at 11:28 AM You are correct jfrancias. That is why I said it must be equal free trade. Trade agreements, must be of corrected, if trade is not equal. If time changes conditions Congress needs to act. I know this is a lot to ask of a 540 member divided committee. Our citizens should not be at a disadvantage. Opportunity should remain in the US so people can provide for themselves and they don’t become government dependent, which puts an extra burden on all of the other citizens. Congress has a lot to learn. Report Violation

These comments and articles are posted at www.bakersfield .com by happyashell

Solving The Unemployment And Foreclosure Crisis

January 27, 2010 by Leonard C. Tekaat

Normal capital markets did not cure the Great Depression of the 1930s and they cannot solve this economic crisis either, because collateral values have decreased so much and so many homes have underwater mortgages. Economic recovery cannot be provided by the capitalist entity because it is still healing and will experience a relapse if interest rates continue to rise.  The government’s job programs of the 1930s helped decrease the misery but they did not end the Great Depression.

I want to discuss with you, a different approach to economic recovery. 

Enclosed you will find an alternative plan to the government’s foreclosure and economic recovery program. I believe that if you improve the purchasing power of a large portion of the population this will help the minority of the population by improving the entire economy. Helping the 10% unemployed is a noble effort but does not create sufficient aggregate demand to re-employ the unemployed or the under employed. The second part of the plan addresses part of problems that caused the bubble economy we have had in the last decade and the reoccurring cycles of recession and inflation since the 1960s 

To solve the unemployment and foreclosure crisis and stabilize mortgage interest rates, we must start by doing two things. 

First, we need to create a mortgage with terms that fit the current economic conditions. 

The new mortgage I am proposing would improve the economy and the financial condition of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac (FNM & FRE) and the banks. I call it the 30 yr. 2010 STABILITY MORTGAGE. It would have a starting interest rate of 3% and increase 1/4% a year. (3% is currently more than 300% above the inflation/deflation rate of 0%.  Mortgage rates have been historically 100% above the inflation rate. (3% inflation, 6% interest rate)The current mortgage interest rate is over 500% above the inflation rate-0% inflation, 5% interest rate). The interest rate on the new mortgage would cap out at 5%. The borrower would have to qualify at the 5% interest rate. Mortgages that are underwater would have their unpaid balance reduced by an amount equal to 20 to 30% of their monthly payment amount each month for 10yrs or until the mortgage equals the current possible sale price of the home. (Reducing the mortgage monthly by a small amount would be less of a loss than by reducing the mortgage by foreclosure or a short sale.) 

If FNM & FRE and the Federal Reserve (Fed) said they would buy a mortgage with a 3% starting rate, the banks would offer it to the public. Temporarily, if necessary the US Treasury would buy  FNM & FRE bonds. (US Treasury would receive the money back when the Fed bought the Mortgage Backed Securities (MBSs) from  FNM & FRE.  The banks would earn the fees for arranging and servicing the home mortgage. FNM & FRE would have less loses from foreclosures. They would be collecting interest on a larger mortgage than if they foreclosed or short sold the home. The MBSs the Fed currently holds would go up in value and should be sold to investors to reduce the Fed’s balance sheet. The Fed would buy the new MBSs and sell them to investors, after home prices stabilized and the mortgage interest rate, on the new mortgage, had risen above the 10yr T-Bill rate. 

Enacting the ZERO INFLATION TAXATION POLICY is the second thing we should do. This policy will help prevent another economic crisis similar to the one that we are currently experiencing. It would also create a stabile market for thirty year fixed rate mortgages. 

Conclusion: Foreclosures should decrease if the mortgage reduction plan is put into effect and the mortgage starting interest rate is reduced to 3%. The homeowner purchasing power will increase by 50% of their monthly interest payment, if their current mortgage interest rate is 6% or more the first year and then slowly decrease the following seven years. With increased consumer purchasing power, total demand would increase, there by employment would increase. The banks would become stronger because their customers would become financially stronger and the collateral for small business loans would be stabilized. 

If this economic recovery plan makes sense to you call your friends, news, and TV station, Congress or the President to express your support.  Unless the private enterprise entity speaks up, the capitalistic entity will continue to gamble in the markets, buy government debt and profit from the Feds discounted interest rate. Thereby denying the enterprise entity the means of exchange at a cost that will allow the economy to have a broad based recovery.  Make the call now!

If you would like to discuss the Zero Inflation Taxation Policy or any other matter, I am available. Go to my web site for more information. www.economysflaw.wordpress.com/ Read Alternative Economic Stimulus Plan. 

E-mail economysflaw@yahoo.com

www.economysflaw.wordpress.com/

Leonard C. Tekaat is a retired economic analyst, economic scholar, businessman, financier, investor, author and former candidate for California Congress. He has over forty years in the financial world.

How FNM and FRE Can Help Solve The Unemployment And Foreclosure Crisis

January 10, 2010 by Leonard C. Tekaat

The US economy has a major unemployment and foreclosure crisis. Millions of people are in the process of losing their homes or are going to be losing a home in the future.  The foreclosure prevention programs the government has created are very expensive and have failed miserable. With 75 billion dollars allotted only 65 thousand home mortgages have been permanently modified.  Something different must be tried. What the government is doing is not working!

I want to discuss with you, a different approach to economic recovery. Normal capital markets did not cure the Great Depression of the 1930s and they cannot solve this economic crisis either because collateral values have decreased so much and so many homes have underwater mortgages. It cannot be provided by the capitalist entity because it is still healing and will experience a relapse if interest rates continue to rise. 

To solve the unemployment and foreclosure crisis and stabilize mortgage interest rates, we must start by doing two things.  First, we need to create a mortgage with terms that fit the current economic conditions.  It must reduce foreclosures and improve employment by increasing total economic demand in the economy. 

The new mortgage I am proposing would improve the economy and the financial condition of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the banks. I call it the 30 yr. 2010 STABILITY MORTGAGE. It would have a starting interest rate of 3% and increase 1/4% a year. (3% is currently more than 300% above the inflation/deflation rate. Mortgage rates have been historically 100% above the inflation rate. The current mortgage interest rate is over 500% above the inflation rate). The interest rate would cap out at 5%. The borrower would have to qualify at the 5% interest rate. Mortgages that are underwater would have their unpaid balance reduced by an amount equal to 20 to 30% of their monthly payment amount each month for 10yrs or until the mortgage equals the current possible sale price of the home. (Reducing the mortgage monthly by a small amount would be less of a loss than by reducing the mortgage by foreclosure or a short sale. It would be better for the banks, investors and the homeowner.)

If FNM, FRE and the Fed said they would buy a mortgage with a 3% starting rate, the banks would offer it to the public.  Temporarily, if necessary the US Treasury would buy the GSEs bonds. (Treasury would receive the money back when the Fed bought the MBSs from the GSEs) The banks would earn the fees for arranging and servicing the home mortgage. FNM&FRE would have less loses from foreclosures. They would be collecting interest on a larger mortgage than if they foreclosed or short sold the home. The securities the Fed currently holds would go up in value and should be sold to investors to reduce the Fed’s balance sheet.  The Fed would buy the new mortgage backed securities and sell them to investors, after home prices stabilized and the mortgage interest rate, on the new mortgage, had risen above the 10yr T-Bill rate. The new Mortgage would stabilize home prices and eliminate the foreclosure inventory. After the foreclosure inventory is eliminated homes should appreciate slowly when the Zero Inflation Taxation Policy in enacted.

Enacting the ZERO INFLATION TAXATION POLICY is the second thing we should do.  This policy will help prevent another economic crisis similar to the one that we are currently experiencing.  It would also create a stable market for thirty year fixed rate mortgages.

In the last decade we have had the dot com bubble. The real estate bubble, the commodities bubble (corn and oil) and almost the leveraged buy out bubble. The Fed was not able to do anything about these bubbles with the tools they have, without disrupting the US and world economies, as they did in the early 1980s by raising interest rates to 17%.

The excessive use of credit in business, investment and consumption got us into this economic crisis. Our income tax system encourages credit use and investing with credit. This is fine as long as the economy needs more credit use but when the economy is showing signs of excessive credit use, such as economic bubbles and inflation, credit encouragement should be curtailed and money investments (savings and bond investments) should be encouraged to maintain balance in our economy. If we first use the income tax to guide investors and consumers before the Fed raises interest rates this will maintain the lowest possible interest rates and maintain the value of existing bonds and securities. We must enact the Zero Inflation Taxation Policy to help prevent another economic crisis. 

Conclusion: 

Foreclosures should decrease if the mortgage reduction plan is put into effect and the mortgage starting interest rate is reduced to 3%.  The homeowner purchasing power will increase by 50% of their monthly interest payment if their current mortgage interest rate is 6% or more the first year and then slowly decrease the following seven years.  With increased consumer purchasing power, total demand would increase, there by employment would increase. The banks would become stronger because their customers would become financially stronger and the collateral for small business loans would be stabilized.

Mortgage Interest Rates Are At Historical Highs

November 12, 2009 by Leonard C. Tekaat

The private financial industry has failed to bring mortgage interest rates down sufficiently, to help the economy recover from the deepest recession our economy has experienced in 70 yrs.  With the Fed funds rate at near zero, 30year fixed rate mortgage rates should be much lower.  From 1993 to1998, to pick a period that the economy was operating fairly well, the 30yr fixed rate mortgage interest rate was approximately 100% above the Fed funds rate.  The Fed funds rate was approximately 3.5% and the mortgage interest rate was approximately 6.5%.  The inflation rate or Consumer Price Index was approximately 3.5%.  The fixed rate mortgage interest rate was approximately 300 basis points above the Fed funds rate.  Currently the Fed rate is at near zero, the 30 year fixed rate mortgage interest rate should be at about 3%, which is 300 basis points above the Fed funds rate.

The problem with the housing market is that the 30yr fixed rate mortgage that is currently being offered to the public has an interest rate that is too high to sufficiently increase consumer’s purchasing power.  Before the current economic crisis occurred the same mortgage interest rate was approximately 6.5%. The current interest rate for the same mortgage is approximately 5%. The spread between the interest rates is not wide enough to warrant the cost of a majority of people with mortgages to refinance.  If these people refinanced their mortgages it would lower their monthly mortgage payments, there-by increasing their purchasing power.  With more purchasing power, the consumer would increase demand in the economy, which would stimulate the economy.  People do not have sufficient purchasing power.  This is reflected in the fact that unemployment and foreclosures rates continue to rise.

With a spread of over 475 basis points between the Fed rate and the interest rate of a 30yr fixed rate mortgage, the only entity whose financial condition is improving is Wall St. investment brokerages and the big banks, which have ties to the those brokerages. All money is returned to the banking industry after it is introduced into the economy.  If the money were lent to the people with mortgages, at a lower starting interest rate, it would help the banks and the economy.

With the economy faltering because of a lack of consumer and investor confidence a stimulus is needed to include the consumer in the economic recovery.

To bring down single-family mortgage interest rates the government should encourage the creation of a mortgage with a starting interest rate of 3%, to stabilize home prices, increase employment, and stimulate the economy with increased demand.  A Stimulus Mortgage should be created. We need to change the terms of our mortgages so Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and other government sponored enterprises can buy and securitize mortgages at lower beginning interest rates. With fewer foreclosures the Federal Housing Administration would not have as many claims and its financial condition would improve.

Lower starting mortgage interest rates would be better for our economy than tax credits.  Tax credits decrease government revenues, which increases the deficit. The government has to borrow more money, which has to be paid back either by a tax increase or an inflation tax.  A smaller federal deficit and an improving economy would calm the worlds fears of a weaking dollar and another round of inflation and higher interest rates.  As our economy improves the dollar would strengthen, stabilizing commodity prices.  The Stimulus mortgage would create more economic activity by a greater number of people.

When the financial crisis occurred in September 2008 the Fed and Treasury helped the economy by using the TARP money to stop the economy from collapsing.  The financial section of the economy is now in much better condition.  It is Main Street that is now in need of a shot in the arm to get well. It can be done without costing the tax payer any money.

Lower starting mortgage interest rates, funded by the Treasury or the Fed would not cost the taxpayers anything, because after home prices stabilize and the economy improves, the mortgages can be sold to private investors.  The Fed will do this with all the mortgage-backed securities that they have bought in the last year.  If the Fed had been buying mortgage-backed securities that included the Stimulus Mortgage I believe our economy would have improved more than it has in the past year. 

Banks and financial institutions are not able to loan homeowners money to refinance their homes,  for  new mortgages. or  make a loan modification, when home prices are decreasing. If a 30 yr. adjustable rate mortgage was created with a starting interest rate of 3%, this would jolt the economy back to life, the toxic securities will become valuable again as home prices stabilize and then appreciate.  

The interest rate on these new mortgages should increase one-quarter percent per year and cap out at the currant market rate of 5%. To decrease defaults on mortgages, the borrower would have to qualify at the 5% interest rate to obtain the loan. These new mortgages should not be tied to any index. We can cap the mortgage interest rate at 5% because the Fed will not be the only entity that will be controlling inflation and inflation psychology.  Read Alternative Economic Stimulus Plan and Zero Inflation Taxation Policy at www.economysflaw.wordpress.com/  

We are currently trying to capitalize the banks by infusing money directly into them. This policy is wrong because the collateral is losing value. As the value of the collateral decreases the banks need more capital to stay viable.  The value of the collateral must be stabilized first, for the banks and investors to be confident enough to lend money against it.  

What will this stimulus mortgage do for the economy?  When the homeowner refinances their home from a 6% mortgage interest rate to a 3% interest rate their monthly interest payment will decrease by 50%. A $1500.00 monthly mortgage interest payment will decrease to $750.00. That will be like the person receiving a $750.00 stimulus check each month for the first year and thereafter a little less each year for the next seven years. Multiply this by millions of people and you will have a stimulus plan that puts the purchasing power were it should be, with the people. The foreclosed property inventory would be quickly sold and housing prices would stabilize.  Loaning money to banks does not create demand in the economy, people do!  

If mortgage interest rates were available at a starting rate of 3% and the borrower was qualified at a 5% interest rate, the chance of a foreclosure would be close to zero. The eight years it would take for the interest rate to rise to 5% would allow the economy to heal. Business activity would increase; this would increase the value of commercial properties reducing the coming crisis in that area of the economy.  With home values stabilized investors will be willing to invest in mortgage securities again rather than treasuries. With the mortgage interest rate increasing every year, the investor will know that their rate of return will increase for the next seven years unlike treasuries.  

Mortgage interest rates historically have been about 100% above the inflation rate for the last 30 yrs.  With inflation at 0% and home prices deflating, mortgage interest rates for the last year have been about 5 to 6% that means they are 500% to 600% above the inflation rate!  

With the enactment of the Zero Inflation Taxation Policy this will help control inflation and inflation psychology. This will maintain the lowest possible interest rate and the chance of another housing bubble would be near zero.  Low interest rates will help maintain the value of the mortgages and mortgage backed securities. (Go to web site to read about this policy change and its benefits.)  

Banks and investors should be encouraged to modify the underwater mortgages by changing the tax code so that it would be beneficial to them and the borrower when the excess amount of the mortgage is reduced.  

Until all the underwater home mortgages are modified the economy will not fully recover.  We need the owners of these homes to be able to partisipate in the economy to increase economic activity. To modify their mortgages we should use a modifiation agreement, not a refinancing agreement. For those people who own a home that the mortgage is greater than the currant selling price, a clause should be included in the modified mortgage that states, the bank will discount the mortgage, an amount equal to 20% of the monthly payment, each month, for a maximum of ten years, or until the selling price of the house plus repairs equals the amount of the mortgage, if the borrower agrees to pay off the entire unpaid balance due. This policy would allow for an orderly decrease in mortgage balances that are above the selling price of the home.

Copyright by Leonard C. Tekaat

All rights reserved 11-14-2009

Tax Credits Vs Stimulus Mortgage

November 5, 2009 by Leonard C. Tekaat

Lower starting mortgage interest rates would be better for our economy than tax credits.  Tax credits decrease government revenues, which increases the deficit. The government has to borrow more money, which has to be paid back either by a tax increase or an inflation tax.  A smaller federal deficit and an improving economy would calm the worlds fears of a weaking dollar and another round of inflation and higher interest rates.  As our economy improves the dollar would strengthen, stabilizing commodity prices.  The Stimulus mortgage would create more economic activity by a greater number of people.

When the financial crisis occurred in September 2008 the Fed and Treasury helped the economy by using the TARP money to stop the economy from collapsing.  The financial section of the economy is now in much better condition.  It is Main Street that is now in need of a shot in the arm to get well. It can be done without costing the tax payer any money.

Lower starting mortgage interest rates, funded by the Treasury or the Fed would not cost the taxpayers anything, because after home prices stabilize and the economy improves, the mortgages can be sold to private investors.  The Fed will do this with all the mortgage-backed securities that they have bought in the last year.  If the Fed had been buying mortgage-backed securities that included the Stimulus Mortgage I believe our economy would have improved more than it has in the past year. 

Banks and financial institutions are not able to loan homeowners money to refinance their homes,  for  new mortgages. or  make a loan modification, when home prices are decreasing. If a 30 yr. adjustable rate mortgage was created with a starting interest rate of 3%, this would jolt the economy back to life, the toxic securities will become valuable again as home prices stabilize and then appreciate.  

The interest rate on these new mortgages should increase one-quarter percent per year and cap out at the currant market rate of 5%. To decrease defaults on mortgages, the borrower would have to qualify at the 5% interest rate to obtain the loan. These new mortgages should not be tied to any index. We can cap the mortgage interest rate at 5% because the Fed will not be the only entity that will be controlling inflation and inflation psychology.  Read Alternative Economic Stimulus Plan and Zero Inflation Taxation Policy at www.economysflaw.wordpress.com/  

We are currently trying to capitalize the banks by infusing money directly into them. This policy is wrong because the collateral is losing value. As the value of the collateral decreases the banks need more capital to stay viable.  The value of the collateral must be stabilized first, for the banks and investors to be confident enough to lend money against it.  

What will this stimulus mortgage do for the economy?  When the homeowner refinances their home from a 6% mortgage interest rate to a 3% interest rate their monthly interest payment will decrease by 50%. A $1500.00 monthly mortgage interest payment will decrease to $750.00. That will be like the person receiving a $750.00 stimulus check each month for the first year and thereafter a little less each year for the next seven years. Multiply this by millions of people and you will have a stimulus plan that puts the purchasing power were it should be, with the people. The foreclosed property inventory would be quickly sold and housing prices would stabilize.  Loaning money to banks does not create demand in the economy, people do!  

If mortgage interest rates were available at a starting rate of 3% and the borrower was qualified at a 5% interest rate, the chance of a foreclosure would be close to zero. The eight years it would take for the interest rate to rise to 5% would allow the economy to heal. Business activity would increase; this would increase the value of commercial properties reducing the coming crisis in that area of the economy.  With home values stabilized investors will be willing to invest in mortgage securities again rather than treasuries. With the mortgage interest rate increasing every year, the investor will know that their rate of return will increase for the next seven years unlike treasuries.  

Mortgage interest rates historically have been about 100% above the inflation rate for the last 30 yrs.  With inflation at 0% and home prices deflating, mortgage interest rates for the last year have been about 5 to 6% that means they are 500% to 600% above the inflation rate!  

With the enactment of the Zero Inflation Taxation Policy this will help control inflation and inflation psychology. This will maintain the lowest possible interest rate and the chance of another housing bubble would be near zero.  Low interest rates will help maintain the value of the mortgages and mortgage backed securities. (Go to web site to read about this policy change and its benefits.)  

Banks and investors should be encouraged to modify the underwater mortgages by changing the tax code so that it would be beneficial to them and the borrower when the excess amount of the mortgage is reduced.  

Until all the underwater home mortgages are modified the economy will not fully recover.  We need the owners of these homes to be able to partisipate in the economy to increase economic activity. To modify their mortgages we should use a modifiation agreement, not a refinancing agreement. For those people who own a home that the mortgage is greater than the currant selling price, a clause should be included in the refinanced mortgage that states, the bank will discount the mortgage, an amount equal to 20% of the monthly payment, each month, for a maximum of ten years, or until the selling price of the house plus repairs equals the amount of the mortgage, if the borrower agrees to pay off the entire unpaid balance due. This policy would allow for an orderly decrease in mortgage balances that are above the selling price of the home.

 

 

 

Does US Economy Need A Stimulus Mortgage

November 2, 2009 by Leonard C. Tekaat

When the financial crisis occurred in September 2008 the Fed and Treasury helped the economy by using the TARP money to stop the economy from collapsing.  The financial section of the economy is now in much better condition.  It is Main Street that is now in need of a shot in the arm to get well. It can be done without costing the tax payer any money.

Lower starting mortgage interest rates, funded by the Treasury or the Fed would not cost the taxpayers anything, because after home prices stabilize and the economy improves, the mortgages can be sold to private investors.  The Fed will do this with all the mortgage-backed securities that they have bought in the last year.  If the Fed had been buying mortgage-backed securities that included the Stimulus Mortgage I believe our economy would have improved more than it has in the past year. 

Banks and financial institutions are not able to loan homeowners money to refinance their homes,  for  new mortgages. or  make a loan modification, when home prices are decreasing. If a 30 yr. adjustable rate mortgage was created with a starting interest rate of 3%, this would jolt the economy back to life, the toxic securities will become valuable again as home prices stabilize and then appreciate.  

The interest rate on these new mortgages should increase one-quarter percent per year and cap out at the currant market rate of 5%. To decrease defaults on mortgages, the borrower would have to qualify at the 5% interest rate to obtain the loan. These new mortgages should not be tied to any index. We can cap the mortgage interest rate at 5% because the Fed will not be the only entity that will be controlling inflation and inflation psychology.  Read Alternative Economic Stimulus Plan and Zero Inflation Taxation Policy at www.economysflaw.wordpress.com/  

We are currently trying to capitalize the banks by infusing money directly into them. This policy is wrong because the collateral is losing value. As the value of the collateral decreases the banks need more capital to stay viable.  The value of the collateral must be stabilized first, for the banks and investors to be confident enough to lend money against it.  

What will this stimulus mortgage do for the economy?  When the homeowner refinances their home from a 6% mortgage interest rate to a 3% interest rate their monthly interest payment will decrease by 50%. A $1500.00 monthly mortgage interest payment will decrease to $750.00. That will be like the person receiving a $750.00 stimulus check each month for the first year and thereafter a little less each year for the next seven years. Multiply this by millions of people and you will have a stimulus plan that puts the purchasing power were it should be, with the people. The foreclosed property inventory would be quickly sold and housing prices would stabilize.  Loaning money to banks does not create demand in the economy, people do!  

If mortgage interest rates were available at a starting rate of 3% and the borrower was qualified at a 5% interest rate, the chance of a foreclosure would be close to zero. The eight years it would take for the interest rate to rise to 5% would allow the economy to heal. Business activity would increase; this would increase the value of commercial properties reducing the coming crisis in that area of the economy.  With home values stabilized investors will be willing to invest in mortgage securities again rather than treasuries. With the mortgage interest rate increasing every year, the investor will know that their rate of return will increase for the next seven years unlike treasuries.  

Mortgage interest rates historically have been about 100% above the inflation rate for the last 30 yrs.  With inflation at 0% and home prices deflating, mortgage interest rates for the last year have been about 5 to 6% that means they are 500% to 600% above the inflation rate!  

With the enactment of the Zero Inflation Taxation Policy this will help control inflation and inflation psychology. This will maintain the lowest possible interest rate and the chance of another housing bubble would be near zero.  Low interest rates will help maintain the value of the mortgages and mortgage backed securities. (Go to web site to read about this policy change and its benefits.)  

Banks and investors should be encouraged to modify the underwater mortgages by changing the tax code so that it would be beneficial to them and the borrower when the excess amount of the mortgage is reduced.  

Until all the underwater home mortgages are modified the economy will not fully recover.  We need the owners of these homes to be able to partisipate in the economy to increase economic activity. To modify their mortgages we should use a modifiation agreement, not a refinancing agreement. For those people who own a home that the mortgage is greater than the currant selling price, a clause should be included in the refinanced mortgage that states, the bank will discount the mortgage, an amount equal to 20% of the monthly payment, each month, for a maximum of ten years, or until the selling price of the house plus repairs equals the amount of the mortgage, if the borrower agrees to pay off the entire unpaid balance due. This policy would allow for an orderly decrease in mortgage balances that are above the selling price of the home.

 

 

 

Treasurer Geithner Create A Stimulus Mortgage

October 31, 2009 by Leonard C. Tekaat

According to Assistant Secretary for Housing – FHC David H. Stevens the US Treasury is the lead agency on Making Homes Affordable program.

To stimulate the economy, create jobs, lower the deficit and stabilize housing prices, we need to develop a plan to improve our economy and put a stop to its destruction.  

To bring down single-family mortgage interest rates the government should encourage the creation of a mortgage with a starting interest rate of 3%, to stabilize home prices, increase employment, and stimulate the economy with increased demand.  A Stimulus Mortgage should be created. We need to change the terms of our mortgages so Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and other government sponored enterprises can buy and securitize mortgages at lower beginning interest rates. With fewer foreclosures the Federal Housing Administration would not have as many claims and its financial condition would improve.

The currant government deficit spending policies (Keynesian Economics) will lead to another inflation economic cycle. We also know that the currant policies used by the Federal Reserve to control inflation and inflation psychology have always created a recession or price increases, which leads to uncontrollable bubbles and then an economic crisis when they burst.  A balanced approach is a better policy.

I am writing this letter today because I feel that you have a good understanding of the primary problem or flaw our economy is experiencing. Enclosed you will find one of many articles that I have written explaining what I believe may be a solution to our economy’s woes. The other articles (The Zero Inflation Taxation Policy, Is President Obama Making A Mistake? Stimulate the Economy Without A Huge Deficit, to name a few.) are at my web site www.economysflaw.wordpress.com/. If you would like to read the Alternative Economic Stimulus Plan that I have written it is at my web site.

Article

Economic Crisis Is Solvable

Home prices are decreasing all over the country. President Obama foreclosure plan is destine to fail. It does not take into account that most homes in CA .NV. AZ, FL. has decreased in price by 40% or more. The rest of the country’s housing has decreased in price an average of 30%. His plan only allows for homes to be 25% underwater. The real estate market and the economy in general will not recover fully until the consumer’s financial condition improves and all home mortgages that are underwater are modified so these homes and their owners can be included into the economy. The homes that are underwater cannot be sold or brought until they go through a short sale; foreclosure or the banks and servicing companies forgive, in some manner, the excess portion, of the loan.

The economy needs the real estate market because our homes are the backbone of our money supply, just like gold was many years ago. The reality of the modern world is that we no longer barter to exchange our goods and services. We use paper money or credit. They are both based on promises. If it is credit that you use as a means of exchange, the collateral must maintain its value over a long period of time, similar to gold. Our homes have served this purpose for many years, until people and government agencies changed policies to create more credit money. Housing collateral is how we provide credit to consumers and small business. If the housing has no equity the banks will not or cannot make the loan.

On our Federal Reserve notes read IN GOD WE TRUST it should read IN THE FED WE TRUST. When the government with its misguided policies and the Fed with its interest rate policies cause the economy to be guided in the wrong direction, they are responsible. If you divert a stream and it does damage to people, you are responsible for paying for the damages. It is not the responsible homeowner’s fault if their mortgage is underwater. A lot of people put 20% or more down and they are in financial trouble today because of the government and the Fed. It is estimated that by the end of 2010 seventy present of the homes in California will be underwater with their mortgages. This problem must be corrected quickly or we will have a major problem in our economy.

When the Republicans want to increase people’s disposable income, they want to lower taxes and reduce regulation. When the Democrats want to increase people’s disposable income they want to deficit spend, create jobs, create more government programs and increase regulation. Both of these policies reduce government revenues and increase the national debt and the government’s deficit, in the beginning of the recovery process. Lowering interest rates does not cost anything and increases more people’s disposable income, by a greater amount, much quicker. This policy puts people back to work faster before the recession gets out of control and changes into a depression. The government’s liabilities are decreased. We do not have to increase taxes to pay down the national debt or to decrease the deficit. With the correct policies enacted the chance of another housing bubble occurring is practically nil.  Read Alternative Economic Stimulus Plan

On 2-24-09 the Fed Chairman Bernanke, appeared before the Senate Banking Committee. Senator Bob Corker stated during the meeting, “He had not yet heard a definite way out of the economic crisis. That it seems to me that we are continuing to do the same thing as we have been doing. That is, giving large amounts of money to the banks, to capitalize them and nothing happens that benefits the economy.” I agree!

The Fed is currently acting as a bank, regarding commercial paper. In his question and answer session the Chairman stated that, “Because the banks were not confident enough to loan businesses money, the Fed, by paying the banks .25% interest on their deposits, the Fed was borrowing the money from the banks and lending to it to the large corporations. I believe that the solution to the economic crisis is that the same policy should be applied to the housing problem.  Banks and financial institutions are not confident enough to loan homeowner’s money to refinance their homes or for new mortgages.

If an adjustable rate mortgage was created with a starting interest rate that is low enough (3%) to jolt the economy back to life, the toxic securities (non-performing mortgages) will become valuable again, when the new refinanced mortgages become performing assets. The interest rate on these new mortgages should increase one-quarter percent per year and cap out at the currant market rate of 5%.  We can cap out the mortgages at 5% because we will no longer be relying on the Fed to be the only government agency providing the means of controlling inflation and inflation psychology. (Read Zero Inflation Taxation Policy) To decrease defaults on mortgages, the borrower would have to qualify at the 5% interest rate to obtain the loan. These new mortgages should not be tied to any index. People do not trust indexed mortgages because of the uncertainty of the future. This is why they prefer the fixed rate mortgage. Currently we need lower rates to stimulate the economy. The banks will make huge amounts of money rewriting the mortgages and servicing them. Thereby becoming profitable and help capitalize them. We are currently trying to capitalize the banks by infusing the money directly into them. This policy is wrong because the collateral is losing value. This situation means the banks will need more and more capital to remain viable. The value of the collateral must be stabilized first, for the banks and investors to be confident enough to lend money against it.

What will this stimulus plan do for the economy? When the homeowner refinances their home from a 6% mortgage interest rate to a 3% interest rate their monthly interest payment will decrease by 50%. A $1500.00 monthly mortgage interest payment will decrease to $750.00. That will be like the person receiving a $750.00 stimulus check each month for the first year and thereafter a little less each year for the next seven years. Multiply this by millions of people and you will have a stimulus plan that puts the purchasing power were it should be, with the people. The foreclosed property inventory would be quickly sold and housing prices would stabilize. Banks and investors should be encouraged to modify the underwater mortgages by changing the tax code so that it would be beneficial to them and the borrower when the excess amount of the mortgage is reduced.  Loaning money to banks does not create demand in the economy, people do! 

If mortgage interest rates were available at a starting rate of 3 and the borrower was qualified at a 5% interest rate, the chance of a foreclosure would be close to zero. The eight years it would take for the interest rate to rise to 5% would allow the economy to heal. Business activity would increase; this would increase the value of commercial properties reducing the coming crisis in that area of the economy.  With home values stabilized investors will be willing to invest in mortgage securities again rather than treasuries. With the mortgage interest rate increasing every year, the investor will know that their rate of return will increase for the next seven years unlike treasuries.

I want you to ask yourself three questions?

1. What is the first thing the Fed does to stimulate the economy? Answer: Lower interest rates, this permits people and business to refinance their debt at a lower rate of interest, which in turn lowers their monthly payments, freeing up monthly income, which increases their disposable income. With more disposable income, people have money to spend on other things, other than interest payments.

2. Why did it not work this time? Answer: Collateral prices were going down. Banks or investors cannot refinance people’s loans until the price of the collateral stabilizes. When the banks and financial institutions did not, would not or could not follow the Fed’s lead, of lowering interest rates, it made deflation and unemployment worse.

3. How do we solve this problem? Answer: The banks cannot lower their interest rates low enough because of the risk factor of the collateral’s price going down. They have to make a profit and pay a high enough interest rate to keep their depositors satisfied. The US Treasury, which is a not for profit government agency, can borrow the money on the open market or from the Fed, just like the banks do, and fund the refinanced or new mortgages, at near cost, until the collateral’s price stops decreasing and investors start investing in the new mortgage securities. The Treasury would receive the cash flow to fund more mortgages. When the economy is up and running again, the Treasury would sell the mortgages to investors. The banks and other financial institutions would arrange these new loans and mortgages or modification agreements. This stimulus plan would not cost the taxpayer a dime.

It has always been the 90% of the population who spends their money and pays their bills that brings the economy out of the recession. When their disposable income increases and they have the money to spend on household goods and services, big-ticket items, autos and trucks ECT. Improving the confidents and financial condition of the 90% will help the 10% unemployed more than any government program.

This plan should be the second stimulus. I would not fund what is left of the first stimulus and modify it to lower the deficit, which would keep interest rates from rising. The reduction in the deficit would calm the world’s fears that we will have inflation in the future and that the dollar will be devalued.

My Plan does not rely on a trillion dollar government deficit. In fact the Alternative Stimulus Plan will not cost the American people anything over time. The Alternative Stimulus Plan also includes a policy that will help those people that owe more on their mortgages than what the house will sell for.

The news has been covering the economic problems. How about a solution?

I present one idea in my ALTERNATIVE ECONOMIC RECOVERY PLAN. You can read it at www.economysflaw.wordpress.com/

Leonard C. Tekaat is a retired economic Analyst, Economic Scholar, Financier, Investor, businessman, author, and a former Candidate for California Congress. He has experience in the financial world of over 40 years.

I am the author of INFLATION THE ECONOMY KILLER (Amazon.com). High inflation and deflation are both economic crisis, which are created when the economy becomes unbalanced. The policies to correct them are opposite of each other. Our concern now is the deflation that is occurring in the real estate market, mainly the housing sector of the economy. The housing sector is so important because it is how we provide credit to consumers and small business. The equity in housing is the collateral for the loan. It is the consumer and household formation that creates 75 to 80% of the economic activity in our economy. I know that some economist say the economy has improved in the last year but it is very possible that we will have a double dip recovery.  I believe that if the Alternative Economic Stimulus Plan is put into action we will end the misery much sooner. 

Copyright Sept 17, 2009

By Leonard C. Tekaat

Alternative Economic Stimulus Plan

October 14, 2009 by Leonard C. Tekaat

CAUSE AND CURE FOR THE HOUSING AND ECONOMIC CRISIS

WHAT TO DO TO CURE THE CRISIS WITHOUT HUGE DEFICITS

 1. Enact the Zero Inflation Taxation policy. This policy will increase confidence of investors to make long-term money investments in the economy, creating a market for 30yr mortgages. It will automatically change the income tax, as economic conditions change in our economy, from recession to the inflation economic cycle.  This policy will help curb the excessive use of credit during the inflation cycle. (For a full explanation of the benefits of this policy change go to www economysflaw.wordpress.com/)

 2.  Create mortgages that have interest rates that are no more than 200 to 300 percent above the annual inflation rate. Maintain mortgage interest rates with Adjustable Rate Mortgages at no more than 50 to 100% above the annual inflation rate.  Have the U.S. Treasury or the Fed fund these mortgages until the investor’s start investing in mortgage-backed securities.  Lowering mortgage rates would be the fastest way to stimulate the economy. By decreasing mortgage interest rates by 50%, mortgage interest payments would decrease by 50% per month. A $1500.00 monthly mortgage interest payment would decrease by $750.00. That is like receiving a $750.00 stimulus check every month.  Remember, the first payment on a thirty year, 0% interest rate, $200,000.00 loan is a $199.10 principal payment, the rest is all interest on an interest bearing loan. To increase people’s disposable income and increase demand in the economy, we must lower interest rates 2 to 3%. November 08 C.P.I. was a negative1.9%and going more negative by the month.  A 3% mortgage rate would be 490% above the deflation rate. Eliminate the deductibility of expenses on non owner-occupied one unit housing units. This policy will increase home ownership in America.

 3. Make using credit to purchase commodities contacts in commodities markets unprofitable.  Credit should be available on the day of delivery. This policy will reduce speculation and hedging, which causes prices to increase and decrease very rapidly, and save our savings pool for necessary production and consumption. 

4. After home prices are stabilized, increase the capital gains tax rate on homes, to the same amount as other long-term capital investments. If home prices are going up more that 2% a year, increase the capital gains tax rate on homes further. Increase down payment requirement, to reduce excessive demand in the market. Do not raise income taxes in general.

5. Make home loans assumable. Include all the terms stated in this stimulus plan. Increase the borrowers responsibility for maintaining the home. Encourage making repairs to the home by making the cost of the repairs tax deductible, in the year they are made. This provision does not include home improvements. This will increase economic activity and maintain the collateral for the loan.

6. Make interest on auto loans tax deductible again to increase sales. To encourage the stabilization of manufacturing cost, the auto industry would also be affected by the Zero Inflation Taxation Policy, by the disallowance of this tax encouragement to buy their product.

7. Currently, do not create a government jobs program or a Federal deficit so large that interest rates rise. Allow this stimulus plan to create more economic activity, then take up slake in the economy, if needed, at an efficient rate, to achieve the infrastructure we need for the future.

8. Do not use high interest rate policies alone to control inflation and inflation psychology. Use the income tax, which will not raise cost or cause a recession.

9. Bundle the mortgages into securities that have the same criteria and purpose. This will make it possible to determine their value, so they will be able to be marketed.

 10. Enact the Oil Conservation Exchange Contribution (OPEC). This policy will help stabilize oil prices and reduce their importation. Help balance the trade deficient. More info. Go to web site.

Gold at one time in our history was the value behind our currency. It was called the Gold Standard. The new Gold Standard is the value of our homes, buildings, land, products, and our economy (people). Correctly guided, our economy will once again make our currency  “As good as gold.” We must change how we make money. “ We must make money the old fashion way, we must earn it.” 

 THERE IS ANOTHER WAY TO STIMULATE THE ECONOMY       

THAT IS FASTER AND MORE EFFICIENT  

STIMULATING THE ECONOMY WITHOUT HUGE DEFICITS

 According to recent articles in newspapers and financial magazines, across our nation we have seen the price of single-family homes drop an average of 31% or more in the past two years. A recent article by Courtenay Edelhart, Californian staff writer, stated, it is predicted we might see another 21% decrease in the median priced home in 2009! More price reductions are expected in 2010 in housing and in the commercial real estate sector of our economy.  The deflation of housing prices was needed after the housing bubble, but we are now at a point where a floor must be put under home prices before we have a complete collapse of our economy. It is very sick because of decades of mismanagement. State and local governments, which rely on property tax money to finance their services, are cutting back and borrowing heavily. Our national debt is expected to increase by trillions of dollars.

INTRODUCTION                                                                                 

 Let me introduce myself. I am sixty-four years old. I am a retired Economic Analyst, Economic Scholar, Financier, Businessman, Investor, Author and former candidate for the California Congress. I have over forty years of being in the financial and business world.  

There is a major flaw in our economic theories.  I wrote a book and several articles outlining new policies to cure economic crisis, now and in the future. It is a guide to correct a major flaw in our economic theories.

We do not need a government jobs program or more bailouts to cure the economic crisis. This is not to say that the things that President Obama is proposing do not need to be done. It would be better if we did them at a slower pace so they could be done in an efficient manner. Job programs were tried in the Great Depression of the 1930s and were only partially successful. It was World War II that finally restarted the economy. We do not want to do that again!       

Because our economy has been misguided for decades, our economy is in terrible shape. Unemployment is rising. Our economy is experiencing an economic crisis. Governments are close to being broke. The federal debt is expected to grow by trillions of dollars. People are losing their jobs and homes by tens of thousands. Business large and small are going bankrupt. People are giving up hope of a better future for themselves and their families.

We have been treating the symptoms of the economic crisis, not the disease. We must try something different. What the government is doing is not working!

Investors must be encouraged to invest in long-term bonds and securities to restart the economy. There are five questions that investors ask before they will get off the sidelines. Will I make a profit? Will my investment retain its value? Will it pay a good return on investment? Will the borrower be able to return my money? Will the economic future be better than the past? If we can satisfy these concerns, investors will get off the billions of dollars they are sitting on and reinvest them in our economy. Breathing new life into it. The government will not have to bailout the economy, if investors and consumers are confident of the future.

John Maynard Keynes (1893-1946) was the British economist who revolutionized economic theories of the 1930s. Keynesian economics works well. The trouble is he did not leave a handbook on how to correctly slow down the economy when it is so strong, that it is creating an economic crisis. We recently had the housing bubble, which got us into this mess, and the oil bubble in the commodities market. The Federal Reserve was not able to do anything about either one of these bubbles. WHY? 

We need a new method to cure economic crisis and control inflation psychology. Our economy has become so big and electronically sophisticated, the old ways no longer work. One of the reasons we are experiencing an economic crisis is we have made investing in capital assets and commodities with rising prices very profitable. Since inflationary investments are taxed at 15%(long term capital gains tax rate) and money investments are taxed at 35%, making the money investments worth 20% less. In fact to offset the capital gains rate on personal residences, which is 0%, and the homes annual appreciation rate is 30%, which we had in 2003-2006, interest rates on bonds, securities and bank savings accounts would have to go up to 45.5 a.p.r, to have the same return on investment. Add in the effect of the interest deduction and you have all the ingredients for a financial crisis. The house became an investment not a home.  The seller had very profitable reasons to sell.  The buyer had very profitable reasons to buy.  This increased dramatically the number sales that occurred, all eagerly financed by the capitalistic entity (financial institutions) of our economy to increase their profits.  Is it any wonder that we had a housing bubble and the Fed could not do anything about it, without killing our economy, and disrupting the world economies?

To halt the falling housing prices, save our auto industry and put people back to work, mortgage rates must decrease 2 to 3%. When the economy refinances, at a lower interest rate, people’s disposable income will increase. The unemployed will be employed, and have more income. People’s confidence level will rise and they will start spending money again! They will be able to afford a new car, there-by saving the auto industry. If the vehicle’s loan interest is made tax deductible again, more vehicles will be sold and at a faster pace.

Banks no longer hold mortgages. They sell them to investors. So we must induce an economic climate so investors are willing to purchase, during this economic crisis and the inflation cycle, long-term bonds and securities, I wrote a book “Inflation the Economy Killer” containing “The Zero Inflation Taxation Policy”, which correctly cures the economic crisis. It correctly controls inflation without hurting the economy, unlike the Fed’s high interest rate policy. It also solves the problems of under investment in the private long-term bond and securities market, during economic crises.

The Zero Inflation Taxation policy would work like this.  As inflation or under investment in the bond and securities market begins to occur, the tax on money investments should automatically be decreased and the interest deduction should be decreased by the same percentage rate, based on the inflation rate. When money investments are taxed at 15%, money investments will be as valuable as inflationary investments.

Most of the time, all capital gains must be taxed at the same rate to correct this imbalance. I do not want to eliminate the long-term capital gains tax rate. We need to encourage people to make productive investments and take investment risks. I want to neutralize it at the correct time in the economic cycle. Even though it will be neutralize for inflationary investments it still will be available for productive investments. If a real estate, stock market or a commodities market bubble is occurring raise the capital gains tax rate on that item or on all long-term investments. If the price of one of the mentioned items are declining too rapidly, lower the capital gains tax rate on that item.  Income taxes in general should not be raised.

In the 1980s, even through interest rates went up to 21%, they were only 100% above the then currant annual inflation rate of 11%. The currant inflation rate is approximately 0%, some economist say we may even be lower than that (deflation). The currant interest rate to buy a home is approx. 6% and decreasing slowly for the most credit worthy people. That is at least 600% above 2008’s inflation rate. If a person has credit card debt, the interest rate is even worse. It can be 2500% or more above the annual inflation rate. If a person has credit card debt equal to their annual gross income, of say $25,000.00, they will pay more interest to the financial institution than income taxes to the state and federal governments combined! The economy cannot function efficiently under these conditions. We must stop the destruction of our economy every 7 to 10 years by high interest rate polices.

ENCOURAGE FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS TO LOWER THEIR LENDING INTEREST RATES.

The capitalistic financial system has become its worse enemy.  If interest rates for mortgages were lowered there would not be as many foreclosures. The value of their collateral would stabilize. The money they are lending can be obtained at the Federal Reserve for a very low rate above the inflation rate. Banks kept the interest rates approx. 300 to 500% or more above the inflation rate all through the 1930s, causing the Great Depression to be worse than it would have been with lower interest rates. The Banks may be keeping interest rates high so they will not loose their depositors or more likely for profit reasons. Banks are investment companies. They invest the money they receive into money investments such as mortgages, business loans, treasuries, and consumer loans, ECT. The banks can have the same concerns as private investors have, as mentioned. This is why the credit system is frozen. It is not a lack of capital. The banks can borrow as much money as they need from the Fed. It is because the collateral is going down in price and people and business’s ability to repay the loan is decreasing every day. The banks will only loan to their most stable customers. The banks must also be able to make a profit to pay their cost.

The US Treasury can also borrow money at the Fed. The Treasury is a not for profit agency. It can fund mortgages for a short period of time at cost or a little above cost to pay for expenses. The Federal Reserve should lend the money to the U.S. Treasury or the Fed should  purchase the new mortgages through the following financial institutions, until there is a floor under housing prices. Treasury or Fed would receive the cash flow from these new mortgages, minus a service fee. It could then use the capital to fund more mortgages.  When housing prices stabilize and investors are willing to invest in mortgage-backed securities, the treasury would sell the mortgages to investors. This economic recovery plan would not cost the taxpayers any money nor would taxes need to be increased to pay off a federal deficit. 

I would not use the TARP money to buy the bad mortgage securities. As the old mortgages are refinance they will change from a delinquent assets to viable assets and be taken off the bad debt list. After the economy restarts and gets strong again, interest rates should rise slightly. The Fed should never let interest rates rise more than 100% above the annual inflation rate. This means that mortgage interest rates must also follow the annual inflation rate down. Mortgage interest rates must be maintained fifty to 100% above the inflation rate to control inflation expectations.

We have special circumstances in our economy at the currant time that warrants this action by the US Treasury and Fed. With the government funding lower interest rate mortgages than the banks and financial institutions, the collateral’s price will stop going down. The banks will have the confidence to lower their interest rates to be competitive.

The Treasury and the Fed will determine the rate of interest for the mortgages it will buy. The Home Loan Bank, Federal Housing Authority, Fannie May, Freddie Mac and any other financial intuitions that are government sponsored, have deposits insurance by FDIC, or are partially owned by the government would create mortgages with that rate of interest. The mortgages should not have an interest rate greater than 200% to 300% above the annual deflation rate.                                                        

When the mortgages are bundled into securities, only those loans that had the same lending criteria and purpose would be allowed into the security. With this policy in place the securities could be correctly rated as to value. Adjustable Rate Mortgages (ARM) should have a starting interest rate of 50to100 % above the annual inflation rate. The mortgage interest rate could not be raised more than one-quarter percent per year or greater than a total APR of 5%. We can cap the interest rate because we will no longer be totally relying of the Fed to control the money supply. The interest rate can be lowered at a faster rate to maintain demand in the housing market. The new buyer must qualify for the mortgage at the highest interest rate the mortgage will obtain.

I believe that if home loans were made assumable, home prices would not have decreased as much as they have. The selling expenses connected to transferring the home to the buyer is considerable less and occurs much quicker, increasing demand, thus there is less time for the home to devalue. If there is no equity left in the home, the seller is not going to pay the extra expenses to sell it in a conventional manner. The homeowner will just let it go back to mortgage holder. Approval of the new buyer, by the lender, must be done before they could assume the mortgage. The mortgage should be adjusted to the current selling price of the house or the banks can agree to a sliding principal amount, as explained later. A 3% pay down of the unpaid principal amount would be required. If equity is less than 20%, mortgage insurance is required. The assumption expenses to the buyer should only be the actual expenses of the mortgage service company. The title insurance should be assumable by the buyer. The buyer should pay a small fee to cover the actual cost of assumption and a title search.

You might be thinking these changes to our financial system would decrease the investor’s willingness to invest in the new securities. Currently investors are not as concerned about the rate of return. They are more concerned about the borrower’s ability to repay the loan and the value of the collateral. With the borrower qualified at the maximum interest rate the interest rate will raise too, the chance of a foreclosure is very minor.  With the mortgage interest rate increasing 1/4 per year, the investor would be more likely to invest in a mortgage backed security, rather than a treasury note that does not have an automatic annual interest rate increase.

People do not abandon their homes because the loan is greater than the current resale price. They have not given up hope that the selling price of the home will increase in the future. They are mainly moving out of their homes because they cannot afford the mortgage payments. They will give the home to the bank, if they have to move, to find less expensive housing or find employment. This is why the loan should be assumable. If the monthly payment is affordable to the buyer, it is better to own the home than to rent. Even if it’s current selling price is less than the mortgage owed. The new buyer will be allowed a tax deduction for the interest and property taxes. This advantage makes their housing cost cheaper than renting. Also it is possible they may make some money on the sale of the home in the future. Even if they do not make money on the sale, they are better off than renting, because they will eventually pay the home mortgage in full. 

For those people who own a home that the mortgage is greater than the currant selling price, a clause should be included in the refinanced mortgage that states, the bank will discount the mortgage, an amount equal to 20% of the monthly payment, each month, for a maximum of ten years, or until the selling price of the house plus repairs equals the amount of the mortgage, if the borrower agrees to pay off the entire unpaid balance due. This policy would allow for an orderly decrease in mortgage balances that are above the selling price of the home. The borrower must also buy mortgage insurance. Again the borrower must qualify for the loan at the highest rate of interest the mortgage will obtain. This clause would benefit both the banks and the homeowner. The homeowner would have a lower monthly mortgage payment when he/he refinances the mortgage at a lower interest rate. The interest paid will remain 100% tax deductible if we maintain low inflation rates. The bank will make up some of the forgiveness of the principle amount because they will collect interest based on the total unpaid balance of the mortgage. The banks will not have the disruption of their mortgage payments, the cost of foreclosure and the sale of the property. To decrease the time and cost it takes to refinance the mortgage a modification agreement should be used. 

The homeowner will also be maintaining the condition of the collateral for their mortgage. 

On all mortgage insured homes the insurance company could either take possession of the home or pay the unpaid amount between the currant selling price and the unpaid balance of the mortgage minus any repairs that need to be made to the home to obtain the highest possible selling price. The borrower should be responsible for any repairs, to encourage the borrower to maintain the collateral. The repairs to a home should be made tax-deductible in the year they are made so the neighborhood does not deteriorate. The banks and borrowers should be encouraged to use a Grant Deed In Lieu of Foreclosure so the amount of time the home is empty will decrease. In this way the banks cost will decrease and borrower responsibilities will not last as long. The shortest turn a-round time will decrease the possibility of damage. The borrower should be responsible for the maintenance of the home until the bank obtains legal possession. The bank does not care who is making the mortgage payment. They do not want the house back. They just want someone to continue making the monthly payments.

To prevent another housing bubble and slow down rising housing prices, if occurring in any of the twelve Federal Reserve Districts, (more than 2% annual price increases) in that District, the secondary mortgage market should require a greater percentage down payment to reduce demand and maintain a strong financial industry. The Fed should not raise interest rates because this causes cost to go up in the economy and causes the economy to slow down in general, which causes a recession. 

If the interest rate for a mortgage is reduced by 2 to 3 % the price of the collateral will stabilize because of the increased number of qualified buyers that would want to buy a home. The foreclosed housing inventory will quickly be sold increasing the value of all the other homes in the neighborhood. When the mortgage is made assumable, the monthly payments will continue to pay down the loan, there-by maintaining the value of the security. The investors will be making a good return on their investment if the interest rate they are collecting is 200% to 300% above the currant annual deflation rate. With The Zero Inflation Taxation Policy enacted, the security instrument will maintain its resale value because the Fed will not have to raise interest rates as high to control inflation and inflation psychology.

There is a second wave of foreclosures on the way, starting in 2009 or 2010, when another set of (ARM) mortgages adjust. If we act quickly, they will adjust down instead of up. With the above policies enacted interest rates will come down, avoiding the possibility of hundred of thousands of more foreclosures and the prolonging of the recession or even developing a depression.

To recap again, the Zero Inflation Taxation Policy will stabilize the long-term bond and securities market, creating a market for 30 year fixed rate or ARM mortgages, at the lowest possible interest rate.

If you agree that these changes need to be enacted, support me in getting them enacted. In this way you will be doing something that will really improve the lives of the American people and families of America. The stock market should go up, replacing some of the value they have lost in their retirement funds.

We do not need a government jobs program or more bailouts to cure the economic crisis. They may do more harm than good. With the government borrowing such large amounts of money, treasury securities will rise in price. Banks and investors will put their money into treasuries and not into the economy and mortgages. A decrease in interest rates would be better than a tax cut because it would increase purchasing power without decreasing government revenues or increasing the national debt. Housing prices must have a floor put under them before more equity is lost. Banks will not loan homeowners money because of a lack of equity unless the homeowner agrees to the previous stated clause.  These policy changes will cause mortgage rates to drop and the stock market should go up. The economy will stand up on its own, without a government bailout.

RECAP—WHAT TO DO TO STIMULATE THE ECONOMY.

1. Enact the Zero Inflation Taxation policy. This policy will increase confidence of investors to make long-term money investments, creating a market for 30yr mortgages. It will automatically change the income tax as economic conditions change in our economy from recession to the inflation economic cycle.  This policy will help curb the excessive use of credit during the inflation cycle.

2. Create mortgages that have starting interest rates that are no more than 200 to 300 percent above the annual inflation rate. Maintain mortgage interest rates with Adjustable Rate Mortgages at no more than 50 to 100% above the annual inflation rate. Have the U.S. Treasury or the Fed fund these mortgages until investor’s start investing in mortgage-backed securities. Lowering mortgage interest rates would be the fastest way to stimulate the economy. By decreasing mortgage rates by 50%, mortgage interest payments would decrease by 50% per month. A $1500.00 monthly mortgage interest payment would decrease to $750.00. That is like receiving a $750.00 stimulus check every month.  Remember, the first payment on a thirty year 0% interest, $200,000.00 loan is a $199.10 principal payment, the rest is interest, on an interest bearing loan. To increase people’s disposable income and increase demand in the economy, we must lower interest rates 2 to 3%. November 08 C.P.I. was negative 1.9%. A 3% starting mortgage rate would be 490% above the deflation rate.  Eliminate the deductibility of expenses on non owner-occupied one unit housing units. This policy will increase home ownership in America.    

3. Make it unprofitable to use credit in the commodities market. Credit should be available on the day of delivery. This will reduce speculation and hedging in the commodities market,  which makes prices rise and fall very rapidly.  This will save our savings pool for necessary productive and consumption reasons.

4. After home prices are stabilized, increase the capital gains tax rate on homes to the same amount as other long-term capital investments. If home prices are going up more that 2% a year increase the capital gains tax rate on homes. Increase the down payment requirement to reduce excessive demand in the market.  Do not raise income taxes in general.

5. Make home loans assumable. Include all the terms stated in this stimulus plan. Increase the borrowers responsibility for maintaining the home. Encourage making repairs to the home by making the cost of the repairs tax deductible, in the year they are made. This provision does not include home improvements. This will increase economic activity and maintain the collateral for the loan.

6. Make interest on auto loans tax deductible again to increase sales. To encourage the stabilization of manufacturing cost, the auto industry would also be affected by the Zero Inflation Taxation Policy, by the disallowance of this tax encouragement to buy their product.

7. Currently, do not create a government jobs program so large that interest rates rise. Allow this stimulus plan to create more economic activity, then take up slake in the economy, if needed, at an efficient rate, to achieve the infrastructure we need for the future. 

8. Do not use high interest rate policies alone to control inflation and inflation psychology. Use the income tax, which will not raise cost or cause a recession.

9. Bundle the mortgages into securities that have the same criteria and purpose. This will make it possible to determine their value, so they will be marketable.

10. Enact the Oil Conservation Exchange Contribution (OPEC). This policy will help stabilize oil prices and reduce their importation. Help balance the trade deficient. 

Gold at one time in our history was the value behind our currency. It was called the Gold Standard. The new Gold Standard is the value of our homes, buildings, land, products, and our economy (people). Correctly guided, our economy will once again make our currency  “As good as gold.” We must change how we make money. “ We must make money the old fashion way, we must earn it.”  

Conclusion

The refinancing of our economy at a beginning rate of 3% would not create another housing bubble or excessive demand in the economy. The changes I have proposed to the income tax will automatically neutralize or remove the Keynesian stimuli that is applied to the economy to help the economy recover from the recession, at the correct time in the economic cycle. In real estate it is location, location, location. In macroeconomics it is timing, timing, timing. Interest rates will remain at approximately 50 to 100% above the inflation rate as the economy improves, with the Zero Inflation Taxation Policy enacted. Investor and consumer’s confidants will be improved and the stimuli to use excessive amounts of credit during the inflation cycle will automatically be neutralized. An interest rate reduction is better than a tax cut or deficit spending because it increases purchasing power without decreasing government revenues or increasing the national debt.  Money investment will increase during the inflation cycle, maintaining our savings pool for productive investments. The Zero Policy also maintains the means of exchange we use in our economy, (credit) at an interest rate that allows our economy to work efficiently. Interest cost will stabilize at approximately 3 to 4% with an inflation rate of 2%. Oil and commodities prices will stabilize because of the OPEC and reduced speculation and hedging in the market.

 Please send this information to as many people and groups as you can. The last four letters in American are I__CAN. We can do this together and as a nation of free people. We are responsible for how our economy is managed and what laws are enacted.                                                                                                

Copyright 12-1-08 by Leonard Tekaat. All rights reserved in the U.S. or any other country. The use of the information in the above article copied or written by the author is strictly forbidden without written permission. 

Additional info, Inflation the Economy Killer, available at Amazon.Com. Leonard Tekaat is an Economic analyst, Economic Scholar, Author Businessman, Financier, Investor and former candidate for California Congress. E-mail leonardc@earthlink.net economysflaw@yahoo.com www.economysflaw.wordpress.com/

 

ZERO INFLATION TAXATION POLICY

October 7, 2009 by Leonard C. Tekaat

Solutions to; Credit Crisis, Housing Bubble, Foreclosures, Recession/Inflation 

To my fellow Americans:

Will you support the change to the income tax law contained in the ZERO INFLATION TAXATION POLICY.  Please send a copy to President Bush, President Elect Obama, your Representatives in Congress and all your friends and anybody else that can help get the word out.

 PREVENTING HOUSING BUBBLES

& GET THE ECONOMY MOVING AGAIN

To get our economy moving again and prevent another housing bubble, the U.S. Congress needs to change the income tax laws, the Federal Reserve must lower interest rates, which they have done, and the banks must be able to decrease long-term mortgage rates.

Mortgage rates should drop 2 to 3%, and stocks should go up as a result of the income tax law changes I am proposing.

There are three things that must be done to lower interest rates and save our economy. First Congress must make a change to our income tax. Then the Federal Reserve Banks must lower their interest rates to their member banks. They have already done this. The banks should be able to lower long-term interest rates to the public, after the income tax change is enacted. Mortgage rates should drop 2 to 3% and stocks should go up as a result of the changes I am proposing!

The current credit crisis could have been avoided by a change in our income tax laws. We should enact what I call “THE ZERO INFLATION TAXATION POLICY”. This policy is a new way of correcting the currant economic crisis, controlling inflation and inflation psychology in our economy. To halt the fall in housing prices, save the auto industry and put people back to work, mortgage interest rates must come down 2 to 3% when the economy refinances itself, at the lower rates, people’s disposable income will increase. The unemployed will be employed and their incomes will increase. Consumer’s conference will rise, and they will start spending money again. Production will increase as people are put back to work. The economy will start working again without a government bailout!  

How can we make it possible for the banks to be able to lower there interest rates on long term mortgages? Banks don’t hold mortgages. They sell them to investors. We must induce an economic climate so investors are willing to purchase long term bonds that back mortgages, during this economic crisis and the inflation cycle.  When inflation starts to occur in our economy, the interest deduction, and the tax on interest income must be decreased. This would cause the economy to become more efficient, create more real wealth and strengthen the American dollar in the world money markets. Paper profits will decrease. (Inflationary investments in housing, commodities etc., purchased with credit, that increases in price without making improvements or increasing supply). This change in our tax code would help the Federal Reserve System (Fed) control inflation and maintain employment. The Fed would not have to raise interest rates as high to increase the value of money. We need this tax policy change, before more and more people become government dependent.

I wrote a book titled INFLATION THE ECONOMY KILLER, (>Amazon.com<) which outlined this POLICY. We need a new method of dealing with economic crisis.  It has become so big and electronically sophisticated the old ways no longer work. One of the reasons inflation exist in our economy is that we have made it very profitable. Since inflationary investment income is taxed at 15%, (long-term capital gains tax rate), money investment income, which is taxed at up to 38%, is worth 23% less. In fact, to offset the capital gains rate on personal residences which is at 0%, and the home’s annual appreciation rate is 30%, interest rates earned on bonds and bank accounts would have to go all the way up to approx. 48.5% to have the same rate of return on investment. Is it any wonder that we had a housing bubble and the Fed couldn’t do any thing about it without destroying the economy?

The Federal Reserve, in the early 1980es, tightened the money supply enough to raise interest rates to 21%. Of course this created a recession, because normal production and consumption cannot continue under these conditions. Many people were thrown into the unemployment lines. Small and large businesses went bankrupt and the government’s responsibilities increased as more people became dependent on welfare. Even though interest rates went up to 21% they were only 100% above the then current inflation rate! The currant mortgage rate is 6%, 600% above the current inflation rate of approximately 0%. Some economist says it could be lower than that! The economy cannot work efficiently under these conditions.

A better way to correct the currant economic crisis, control inflation psychology and maintain the value of money is by progressively reducing the interest deduction and the tax on interest income, at the same percentage rate, as inflation increases in our economy. The balance of our economy would be maintained. Whenever the interest earned on money investments becomes 15% taxable income, money investments would be as valuable as inflationary investments. This POLICY, when used during an inflationary period, would automatically take excess demand out of the market place, slow down the economy and maintain the value of money.

. When people try to protect the value of their money from inflation, by investing in inflationary investments, to receive paper profits, they create more debt (money) and more inflation. With the enactment of the “zero inflation taxation policy” normal production and consumption would continue. It would have the money, at the lowest possible interest rate, it needs to maintain employment and raise the standard of living of all our citizens. The long-term capital gains tax rate would still be in effect but those people who make capital improvements and increase the real wealth of our economy would benefit from its existence. They would not be making inflationary investments because inflation would not be profitable, or making investments to protect their money from inflation. Their money would stay in the credit system of our country, supporting increases in production and normal consumption, thus maintaining low interest rates and inflation rates.

The ZERO INFLATION TAXATION POLICY would eliminate inflation psychology without raising interest rates, therefore stabilizing credit cost. This policy would not reward inflationary investment. It would encourage productive investment. It would automatically change our economy from a high credit use and a decreased saving economy, to a system that encourages money and productive investments. This change is exactly what our country needs right now! We need to be able to lower interest rates without creating another round of inflation or a housing bubble; commodities, energy/oil bubble. We need a 2 to 3% mortgage rate drop to refinance the economy and return purchasing power to the consumer to avoid a deep recession.  (Explanation in discussion section, comment  #7.)

Feel free to contact me if you need additional information on the book or for any other reason. The Book INFLATION THE ECONOMY KILLER is available at Amazon.com

Sincerely

E-mail address: leonardc@earthlink.net

Copyright 1992

Section One EDIT | REMOVE

 

COMMENT # 1
 Comment one smitty1:  The last thing on earth that we need is a 4% mortgage rate. Housing is a consumer good believe or not. It happens to appreciate, but the bulk of your return is being kept out of the rain. Subsidizing consumption with low interest rates has been at the root of the problem. Your assessment that capital gains derive from inflation is partially true. The rest of it is created from increasing return on fixed investments. Some of my cap gains on Microsoft are inflation; the rest is that it is a great business. Your solution has no way to distinguish between the two.Answer for Comment One happyashell: The reason that long term mortgage rates need to drop 2 to 3% is to put a floor under housing prices. This is the rate that housing becomes affordable. The inflation rate is 0%. Historically interest rates have been maintained 20 to 100% above the inflation rate, Currently they are 600% above the inflation rate. The purpose of this POLICY is to automatically change the character of the income tax system, as the economy changes from a recession to an inflation cycle, without the Fed or government intervention. As far as the capital gains are concerned, your Microsoft investment is a productive investment. The point is that when the economy enters an inflation cycle, people start making inflationary investments creating more inflation. The use of credit, to leverage these investments, decreases our savings pool for non-productive reasons.

 

 

 

 

Section Two EDIT | REMOVE

 

COMMENT # 2
COMMENT TWO Smitty1: Lower interest rates… See Japan circa 1990. We need to (a) increase national productivity, wages (b) increase the return on capita, wealth (c) increase the productivity of housing. Lowering interest rates does nothing other than forces lenders to subsidize people living beyond their means. This isn’t part of the solution. It is the problem. Your solution doesn’t fix housing; it simply lets it deflate more slowly.ANSWER to TWO happyashell: the banks under my proposal do not subsidize The 4% mortgage rate. The Fed is loaning money to the banks at 1%. If the banks hold on to the mortgage they would be making a 300% short-term profit with a 4% mortgage rate. As interest rates come down the market value of the mortgage goes up, and the banks will make a profit when they sell it. The 4% rate would increase the number of buyers interested in purchasing a house. The foreclosure inventory would be quickly absorbed. The loan would be a 30yr fixed rate. (In the 50s we had 4-5% mortgage rates). It would be the banks responsibility to make sure the new buyer could afford the loan. The problem of the excess supply of houses would be solved without a taxpayer bailout. It would not be beneficial at this time to increase the production of housing since we have excess supply and to little demand. There are two things that can happen to increase demand in an excessive supply situation. Number one; let the price fall until the property becomes affordable or number two; you can lower interest rates until it becomes affordable and then refinance, as much as possible, the entire economy, at a lower rate, to release more purchasing power to increase demand. Continuing to allow the price of housing to fall would cause a complete re-valuation of the economy. Meaning state, county, and cities would lose their tax base. They would have to raise taxes on everybody left standing, borrow money and create civil projects to put money (demand) back into the economy, or layoff thousands of employees, making a recession into a depression. The last four letters in American is I CAN! ….WE CAN DO THIS TOGETHER or as a Nation. When you take out the fear factor and the inflation premium out of interest rates, they will come down. The Zero Inflation Taxation Policy takes care of both of these problems. A great president once said, “The only thing we have to fear, is fear its self.” Smitty, When I say a possible 4% mortgage interest rate, this would be the ideal rate. The markets would have to determine how low the rate could go. I just wanted to point out that the banks would be making a profit based on that source of funds. A lot of money could enter the market place, based on the trillions of dollars of value that have been lost, before inflation would be a problem any time soon.

 

 

 

 

Section Three EDIT | REMOVE

 

COMMENT # 3
Comment Three: Smitty1and Bosterd, What is your ideal rate to fix the auto industry? We have lots of unsold cars. Your entire theory is what Allan Greenspan did, and it is the cause of what we are suffering. Lowering interest rates on a consumer good is inflationary. You can call this idea zero inflation just as you can call a boat a banana. This is a subsidy. Subsidies do not create demand, they shift existing demand around. So you will have people in $700,000 houses that can’t afford a cot. Is this really a good idea? On your comment “It would take an additional 50% further drop in housing prices to bring down the 6% monthly payment to equal the 3% monthly payment.” Are you really trying to imply that interest rates are dollar for dollar the same as principal amounts? In your assumption, banks borrow 100% of mortgage funds from the Fed to lock in their interest rate spread of 200%…how do you account for a bank’s oppty cost of being able to invest in anything they want that has a much better return than 3%…. could probably lock in bond values with much better returns and less default risk…. to Smitty’s point, when Greenspan finally steps up and admits that he held interest too low for too long…. how can the assumption be made that it would be good to lower interest rates even further. Inflation isn’t good for the economy, but it is Risk that is the killer. Capitalism as a pet likes to be fed stability and confidence. Risk is sand in the machine. In a micro sense, my lawn guy first got killed by rising oil prices, and now is getting killed by lower oil prices because he can’t adjust his pricing quickly. He can’t reprice down because he knows that oil may rise quickly again. That is a micro. But look at GM; oil prices rise so they shutter an entire plant making SUVs. They retool a plant for high MPG cars, and now Americans don’t want them either.  ANSWER to Three: 6% X $200,000.00=$12,000.00 divided by 12 mo.=1,000.00 mo. Int. payment. 3% X $200,000.00=$6,000.00 divided by 12 mo.=$500.00 mo. Int. payment. $100,000.00 X 6% = $6,000.00 divided by 12 mo =$500.00. Each monthly principle amount is the same, on either monthly payment, to payoff a 30yr fixed rate loan, so that amount would be added to the monthly payment to pay off the loan in 30yrs. On a 30yr loan the first monthly principle amount, subtracted from the balance due, starts out small and increases as the unpaid principle amount decreases and the interest amount decreases. By refinancing the economy at the lower rate, consumer’s purchasing power will increase and the economy will start working again. The consumer is a major part of economic activity in the economy. As for the banks seeking higher rates of return; a profit is a profit is a profit. As far as Greenspan’s statement, he was correct in saying he was wrong. He was the Chairman of the Fed and did not realize how important it was that Congress had changed the income tax laws by allowing and capital gains exclusion of $500,000.00 on personal residences. There was no way, unless he had done it in the very beginning of the housing bubble, he could have raised interest rates to overcome the paper profits that the home buyer could make. They were willing to pay ever-higher prices for homes. Even though the investor did not have this exclusion they were making a very good return on their investment. Some of them even lied on their credit applications to obtain the capital gains exclusion. I believe the capital gains rate should apply to all personal residences, to correct this imbalance.                                                                                                                            The ZERO POLICY would help control the excessive use of credit and low savings rate that occurred now and in the 70es, before the exclusion was enacted. The Fed uses a sledgehammer approach to drive in a tack. The setting of interest rates is not an exact science. Many times the Fed is wrong and the economy (people) is hurt by it. The ZERO POLICY works with the Fed to make the process more accurate. In the 50es the economy was working on a lower interest rate structure.
Interest rates were not being subsidized When President Kennedy was elected he applied Keynesian Economics principals to the economy to end the recession. The Federal Government has continued to do this every time there was a recession. John Maynard Keynes gave us a theory that worked to get the economy back up on its feet, but did not leave a handbook on how to correctly slow down the economy’s boom period, with out causing a recession. The ZERO INFLATION TAXATION POLICY offsets all of the stimuli that the Congress has enacted, without their intervention, to bring the economy out of recession, much more smoothly than the Feds high interest policies. High interest policies go to far, causing another recession. The automobile industry will recover as the economy recovers. With interest rates lower, and as people regain their disposable income, they will buy more automobiles. The automobile industry has many new products, they will come out with in the coming years that will change the way we transport ourselves. Out with the old, in with the new! 

 

 

 

 

Section Four EDIT | REMOVE

 

COMMENT #4
COMMENT Four: Smitty: First, oil price swung because our govt is run by idiots who let it run. Supply and demand works great for widgets. Price rises and demand falls. In the case of necessities, price rises from scarcity create demand. It also shrinks supply. The result is an unstable economic model in which prices rise rapidly, and then collapse. What we saw on oil is called hording, where all of the speculators go to one side of the trade. We don’t agree on what the last 20 years were. It was a liquidity bubble, which you would like to re-create. Liquidity first went into stocks particularly technology, then into housing, then into everything from art to bonds to commodities. You still didn’t answer my question. What is the appropriate interest rate to fix the auto industry? Once you figure that out, you can tell us what the correct interest rate is for retailers – who are in a mess as well. And you aren’t fixing housing, other than by creating a bigger mess in the autos, retailers, and every other sector of the economy that depends upon credit.ANSWER To Four Happyashell: I agree with you it was a liquidity bubble that has caused the currant economic crisis. I agree with you that Greenspan maintained interest rates to low for to long. I agree that a lot of people bought houses that they couldn’t afford. The currant system failed us all. I do not want another liquidity bubble to form. You are not considering what the effect will be with the change in the income tax I am purposing. What I also don’t agree with is how government uses the income tax to facilitate an economic recovery and then leaves the peddle to the metal, creating inflation. The main thing I am trying to do is change the way the credit bubble is controlled, before it becomes a bubble. The Fed doesn’t have all the tools it needs to control inflation and maintain employment. It needs the income tax to change as inflation begins to be created. We have gone through the cycles of recession and inflation over and over again. Only a crazy person does the same thing over and over again, if something doesn’t work. If interest rates come down so be it. It is not the main reason I wrote the book and developed the Zero Policy. We have to stop tearing our economy apart and rebuilding it again, over and over again. The currant policies are not efficient. It creates more and more people that are government dependent. The automotive industry is hurting because people have the fear of losing their job and a lack of disposable income. Maintaining a roof over their head is more important than owning a new car. It is not interest rates. The auto dealers have all kinds of low interest rate and rebate programs, yet new cars and trucks are not selling. You are right, high gas prices didn’t help, although lower gas prices haven’t improved things either. On your comment on oil prices; Normal consumption does not cause wide swings in prices as we have seen in the last year, unless you have a major disruption in supply and demand stays the same. This has not happened, only rumors. I think the price of oil is changing so quickly because there is too much money moving in and out of the market. Some of it is caused by the fear, of the devaluation of people’s store of wealth. Leveraged opportunity investors join the fear investors, and then the retail investors join in. Which creates abnormal demand. This is why I support a policy that states if a person wants to invest in commodities they should pay the total amount of the contract with cash, not 5% down and the rest financed. The economy has turned into a game of Musical Chairs. Who is going to end up holding the worthless debt (money)? It is all made up of promises, be it dollars or promissory debt. This is why it is important to keep the economy working, so everyone can keep his or her promises. Investors start the bubble and then every one else joins in to make the paper profits. Every recession since World War Two has been caused by excessive credit use. The Fed does not raise interest rates because of an excessive supply and excessive competition; it raises interest rates to reduce demand. They reduce demand too much, which causes another recession.

 

 

 

 

Section Five EDIT | REMOVE

 

COMMENT #5
COMMENT Five Smitty: You have two different ideas here. The Zero Inflation control is theoretical. It assumes that you know what the inflation rate is. Congress tinkers with the rate to an extent that no one really knows what it is. If you had used house prices instead of rental property as a proxy for CPI, the CPI would have been in the double digits rather than the benign rate that has been reported. The real problem that this society has is that we give tax breaks to people who borrow money for business. If you pay a dividend you get zero tax breaks where as if you pay interest it is a deduction. Is it any wonder that we have private equity paying 15 times cash flow entirely paid for with debt? Your solution assumes that you have an almighty person who knows what interest rates should be. It assumes that you know which industries are worth saving and which ones aren’t. For example, a car might be considered as important as the roof when that car gets you to a job that keeps the roof over your head. Whether you start with a genius or not, all systems need to be designed to be run by an idiot because at some point they will be.ANSWER to Five happyashell:  Smitty: Were getting close to an understanding between us. Currently the income tax rewards people to do the wrong things at the wrong time in the economic cycle. This is why the Policy automatically changes the income tax as economic conditions change. You are right; the government has tampered with the CPI. It was done when President Regan was in office. They did it so it did not show the real rises in the cost of living. This way, the government programs that are tied to the CPI would not have to increase their benefit payments and the employees could not ask to be paid higher wage, based on the CPI. Just because the government has changed the way it figures the Consumer Price Index, by removing housing and energy cost, does not mean that HIGH INFLATION has not occurred in our economy, in the last 25 years. Marc Faver, the noted author of GLOOM, BOOM and DOOM Financial News Letter, and I agree that the US government does a lot, sometimes to much, to prevent a recession, but very little to control a boom. A boom is more profitable for governments, but it leads to a recession. When the Fed steps in with their HIGH INTEREST RATE POLICY, too late or for too long, THE ECONOMY GOES BUST AGAIN, and thousands of small and large businesses go bankrupt. People lose their jobs, their homes and their hope of a better future. Believe me when I say,” The Fed knows exactly what the inflation rate is”. They even know what it is in each of its twelve districts.  

 

 

 

 

Section Six EDIT | REMOVE

 

COMMENT #6
COMMENT Six Smitty: I love Marc, and his ponytail. He is the one person most singularly responsible for me staying at arms reach of this mess. While I will agree with what you are saying, I continue to believe that your idea is a theory that can’t be put into practice. Until you have a measure for CPI, you can’t adjust your taxes. I do not agree however that your theory is sound because it fails to promote stability, which is the cornerstone of capital creation. People need to know what their taxes will be for a year. We should remove the incentives for stupidity in the first place rather than adjust them year in and year out.ANSWER To Six happyashell: I believe that we will always have the business cycle. The government uses the income tax to soften the recession. It can also be used to prevent the boom from getting out of hand. The information the Fed receives about the economy is what they now use to set interest rates. It can be used to figure the CPI. The CPI should be as accurate as humanly possible, helped by technology. The number isn’t as important as how it will change the income tax and inflation psychology. As far as a yearly tax is concerned, the adjustment would take place at the end of the year. Based on the inflation rate, the person holding the debt (money) would pay a little less tax, and the person holding the hard capital asset would pay a little more tax. The first having lost value and second having gained valued. In this way the economy would stay in balance.

 

 

 

 

Section Seven EDIT | REMOVE

 

COMMENT #7
COMMET Seven Smitty1: The essence of our difference is that you believe that the government is able to manage interest rates. I don’t. I don’t think it justifies the instability that you will introduce by changing tax rates/deductions. People want to know what taxes are/will be before they are willing to invest. The variable component to your idea will hurt the economy more than the management will help. Mind you, like The Glass Stegall Act, your idea will be repealed once it gets in the way of the boom.ANSWER To Seven Happyashell: The POLICY will stabilize the long term bond market, which creates a market for home mortgages, On the Federal Reserve Notes it written, “ IN GOD WE TRUST “, it should say, “ IN THE FED WE TRUST”. Yes I believe the Central Banks have the power of life or death over the economies of the world. When a person is earning 4% interest and the Fed raises interest rates 1% the holder of the bond loses up to 25% of its value depending on its maturity date. If the Fed makes a mistake the economy gets into big trouble, as we have now. If the Zero Inflation Taxation Policy is enacted. Investors in long-term bonds and saving accounts will be assured that the interest rates will continue to be low, and the value of their investments will be maintained. The economy will continue to work efficiently. Economic opportunities will continue to be available to everyone. In this way people will be able to provide for themselves and continue their pursuit of happiness.  The Zero Policy would only change the income tax after the economy is unbalanced, for whatever reason. The effect on normal production and consumption would be minimal. It is the excesses that I am trying to contain without causing a recession. I am also making it automatic, so it takes action before the Fed does and, congress being a divided, over 500 member committee, can’t do it fast enough. In the beginning of any economic cycle it would take much less action to rebalance the economy, unlike what we have to deal with now. People will still make productive investments. The long-term capital gains tax rate will still be in the income tax code. The only thing I am trying to influence is the people’s attitude toward credit use, money investment and the saving rate when the inflation cycle is starting. Someone has to be willing to hold the debt (money) to finance the increases in production to rebalance supply & demand. We shouldn’t be expanding the money supply at that point in the inflation cycle. Unlike the Fed’s high interest rate policy, the excess demand would be taken out from the top of the economic ladder. People holding money, as their store of wealth, would be more willing to hold onto it and invest in it, because of the changing income tax. This change in the code would help finance the increases in production to rebalance supply and demand. High interest rates take demand out of the economy, from the bottom of the economic ladder, causing all kinds of misery. When more people want to make money investments, and credit demand is down, interest rates come down. The economy would refinance at a lower rate of interest. This is how we can obtain the lowest possible mortgage rate. The market will provide it, if the Fed will let it.
 
We don’t need to “share the wealth,” nor do we need anything to “ trickle down to any able body person,” We need to create people with the ability and maintain the economic opportunities, so people can climb up to what ever level of wealth they can obtain and are comfortable with.If The Zero Inflation Taxation Policy is enacted investors in bonds and saving accounts will be assured that interest rates will continue to be low, and the value of their investments will be maintained.  The economy will continue to work efficiently and opportunities will continue to be available for everyone. 

How “The Zero Inflation Taxation Policy” will work:

 Money Investments and Savings Income

Inflation Rate                                                                           Interest Earned

0% APR                                                                                    5% APR
                                                                                                   100% Taxable Income

2.5% APR                                                                                  5% APR
                                                                                                    50% Taxable Income

5% APR                                                                                     5% APR
                                                                                                    0% Taxable Income

                                                            Interest Deduction

Inflation Rate                                                                            Interest Paid

0% APR                                                                                      5% APR
                                                                                                    100% Tax Deductible

2.5% APR                                                                                  5% APR
                                                                                                    50% Tax Deductible

5% APR                                                                                     5% APR
                                                                                                    0% Tax Deductible          
copyright for all of the sections above
 2008

 

 

 

Deep Recession Was Avoidable

May 26, 2009 by Leonard C. Tekaat

Basically what has happened to our economy, the means of exchange has decreased significantly.

The Committee For Economic Reform and a Better Economic Future has developed an Alternative Economic Stimulus plan to restart our economy. It does not require the Federal government to create a huge deficit, to return consumer’s deposable income.

CSUB Professor of Economics Mark Evans was quoted as saying, we are going to have to live with large deficits for a long time, and there is no other way. We disagree with that statement. The Committee believes that there is another way.

President Obama is relying on Keynesian Economics. John Maynard Keynes’s policies put governments into massive debt, to stimulate the economy and return people’s disposable income. Over time more government programs are created, increasing the size of government, as our economy cycles through periodic periods of recession and inflation.

Consumption and home creation represents 75% of the economic activity in our economy. The economy will not fully recover until the consumer’s financial condition and confidence improves. Investor confidence, in making long-term investments, needs to improve also. This will happen as the economy improves and when we enact the Zero Infation Taxation Policy.

When the Federal Reserve lowered the Fed rate and the banks and other financial institutions could not follow the Fed’ lead, of lowering the cost of the means of exchange, the collapse of employment and the stock market occurred. If lower interest rates had been available, for credit worthy borrowers, the money supply would have quickly expanded, creating enough of the means of exchange for our economy to continue to work.  The recession would not have gotten out of control, causing the massive layoffs, decreasing people’s disposable income, there-by causing the economy to continue its downward spiral. Consumer and investor confidence was thus lost.

The enterprise economic system cannot operate efficiently, without the correct amount of the means of exchange (money) being in balance with available supply.

To completely understand the principles behind the Alternative Economic Stimulus Plan you will need to read it and the other economic policy papers. About 5% of the money we use to exchange our goods and services is represented by paper money.  The other 95% of the means of exchange is created with credit.  Credit expands the money supply.  Because of the collapse of the price of housing and the stock market, trillions of the means of exchange (money), has evaporated (gone).  The economy has an insufficient amount of the means of exchange in it to create enough demand to balance demand with available supply. This is why people are being laid off.  Our available supply is greater than we need, because people have less money to buy the products they want.  Their confidence to make long-term commitments has been shattered. They are only willing to spend money on the things they need and not make long term plans for the future, because they are not sure they will have a job or business tomorrow. 

The federal government created a huge deficit to increase the means of exchange in our economy to increase demand, so our economy will start working again, and the unemployed will be re-employed.  The Committee  is offering an alternative idea.  Give the power to the people.  Let them create the money.  In this way we make the decisions, on what the money will be spent on. 

The restarting of the economy is the easy part.  It is the slowing down of the economy, before inflation is created, that is the hard part.  The currant method of slowing down the economy, by increasing interest rates until the means of exchange is too expensive to conduct business, creates a recession.  If the policies I have outlined in the Alternative Economic Stimulus Plan had been enacted, the housing bubble would not have occurred and we would not have created the deep recession that we are going through.

The Committee is asking you for your endorsement and support of the Alternative Economic Stimulus Plan. They are asking you to please review it at their web site. http://www.economysflaw.wordpress.com/ They also want you to read the other economic policy papers first, so you will obtain a complete picture of why we are repeating the mistakes of the Great Depression. Without the changes we need to improve our economy, we will continue to repeat the mistakes of the past.

They said that we could make this happen. We have the opportunity to leave our posterity a more secure and stable future. We are a nation of free people. We are responsible for the laws that are enacted and for the policies that guide our economy. We can make a difference. Do it for your grand children and great grand children. End the recession now, without a huge federal government deficit and another cycle of inflation.

The Committee is asking you to send this article to your local newspaper,  representatives and President Obama.  Sent it to 10 or more of your friends, so they can do the same.  Add your name and the statement that you support the Alternative Economic Stimulus Plan.  In this way the little people and small business will finally be heard.